This is a computer translation of the original webpage. It is provided for general information only and should not be regarded as complete nor accurate. Close Disclaimer
Skip to main content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it's official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you're on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Observations From Our Review of CMS's Administration of the First Performance Year of the Pioneer Accountable Care Organization Payment Model

We reviewed the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services' (CMS) administration of the Pioneer Accountable Care Organization (ACO) Payment Model (Pioneer Model).

In general, a Medicare ACO is composed of a group of health care providers and suppliers who accept joint responsibility for the cost and quality of Medicare Parts A and B for a specified group of fee-for-service beneficiaries. CMS assigns beneficiaries to each Medicare ACO on an annual basis according to each program's specifications. Through the Pioneer Model, CMS sought to support experienced ACOs in the transformation of their business and care delivery models so that they are not reliant on fee-for-service volume and could focus on optimizing outcomes of care.

Calendar year 2012 was the first performance year (PY1) and was the only completed year at the time of our data collection. End of
Translation
Click to Translate text after this point
Because our review was limited to the first year of one ACO model, we are making no formal recommendations, and our observations do not represent an overall assessment of CMS administration.

Our observations on CMS's administration of Pioneer Model PY1 include that CMS (1) although not required to do so, did not publicly disclose certain retroactive payment arrangement selections for PY1; (2) did not have access to data needed to verify shared savings and loss calculations; (3) did not promptly process and collect the only shared loss; (4) performed two Pioneer ACO pilot audits and, although not required to do so, may not have communicated and resolved the results; and (5) did not always maintain complete Pioneer ACO agreements and other key documentation.