This is a computer translation of the original webpage. It is provided for general information only and should not be regarded as complete nor accurate. Close Disclaimer
Skip to main content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it's official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you're on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Multiple States Made Medicaid Capitation Payments to Managed Care Organizations After Enrollees' Deaths

Why OIG Did This Audit

HHS-OIG has identified effectively administering the Medicaid program to improve oversight and address high improper payments as a top management challenge facing the HHS. Fourteen previous OIG audits found that State Medicaid agencies improperly made capitation payments to managed care organizations (MCOs) on behalf of deceased enrollees.

Our objective was to summarize the results of our previous audits of Medicaid capitation payments that States made to MCOs on behalf of deceased enrollees. In addition, we sought to identify steps that the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid (CMS) could take to reduce these unallowable Medicaid capitation payments.

How OIG Did This Audit

Our prior 14 audits covered 450,562 Medicaid capitation payments totaling $318,167,200 that States made to MCOs on behalf of deceased enrollees during audit periods ranging from July 1, 2009, through December 31, 2019. We used a combination of statistical sampling and data analytics to select 50,292 Medicaid capitation payments totaling $16,270,039 for review. End of
Translation
Click to Translate text after this point
To identify steps that CMS could take to improve its Medicaid oversight, we interviewed CMS officials and assessed its internal controls related to its resolution of the audit findings as well as its internal controls specific to ensuring that States are sufficiently preventing Medicaid capitation payments from being made to MCOs on behalf of deceased enrollees.

What OIG Found

In our previous audits of 14 States, we identified more than $249 million ($172 million Federal share) in unallowable Medicaid capitation payments that the States made to MCOs on behalf of deceased enrollees. These unallowable payments occurred for various reasons. CMS concurred with all of our recommendations made to the States in our prior audit reports and has ensured that actions have been taken on most of our recommendations.

In this audit, we identified additional actions CMS could take to help States that continue to make improper capitation payments to MCOs on behalf of deceased enrollees. Specifically, CMS could develop a process to routinely match Transformed Medicaid Statistical Information System (T-MSIS) enrollment data against the Social Security Administration's (SSA's) Death Master File (DMF) data to determine States that are at a high risk of making improper payments to MCOs on behalf of deceased enrollees. CMS could then provide the results of the data match to high-risk States for further verification of whether improper payments were made, and those States could use the results of the data match review to develop corrective actions and improve controls to detect and prevent such payments.

What OIG Recommends and CMS Comments

We recommend that CMS take the following steps: (1) collect the outstanding unallowable payments totaling the estimated $41,003,804 we previously identified, (2) ensure that States complete actions on our remaining recommendations to address the internal control weaknesses we identified, and (3) continue to explore opportunities for using T-MSIS and SSA's DMF data to improve its oversight of the Medicaid program. Specifically, CMS should develop a process to match enrollment and payment information in T-MSIS with the DMF and provide the results of that match to States to help reduce Medicaid capitation payments made to MCOs on behalf of deceased enrollees.

In response to our draft report, CMS neither concurred nor nonconcurred with our first and second recommendations, and it did not concur with our third recommendation. Regarding our first two recommendations, CMS officials stated that they have worked closely with all 14 States to ensure that they implement OIG's recommendations as appropriate and regularly provide updates to OIG on the status of recommendations. CMS stated that most of the recommendations from the prior OIG audits have already been implemented, which demonstrates that it is committed to closing the remaining recommendations as soon as possible. CMS officials requested that OIG remove these recommendations given the work CMS has done and continues to do with States to close the remaining recommendations associated with our 14 prior audits.

CMS officials also requested that OIG update its third recommendation to focus on providing clearer guidance to States to help them better understand how to use the DMF to identify individuals enrolled in Medicaid who may be deceased. CMS noted that States already have access to several data sources, in addition to the DMF, that may be used to obtain information about enrollees who may be deceased. CMS officials said that adding a new process could prove redundant, inefficient, and confusing to States.

After reviewing CMS's comments, we maintain that our recommendations are valid. We commend CMS for the actions it has taken to work with States to close the recommendations contained in our 14 prior audits. However, we disagree with CMS's request to remove the first two recommendations, as there are still actions that CMS needs to take to collect the remaining $41 million in unallowable payments and to implement the remaining unimplemented recommendations. Regarding our third recommendation, we agree that States have access to several data sources, in addition to the DMF, that may be used to obtain information about enrollees who may be deceased. However, we disagree with CMS's statement that developing a process to match enrollment data in T-MSIS with the DMF for monitoring purposes could prove redundant, inefficient, and confusing to States.

Filed under: Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services